Some Thoughts on Burning of the Three Fires by Jeanne Marie Beaumont

   

Some Thoughts on Burning of the Three Fires

by Jeanne Marie Beaumont (BOA Editions, 2010)

 

by

 

Robert Mueller

 

It is a pupil, image of small self in cantering of eye.  Someone is watching.

Now go ahead.  You are free.  You may be free.  You may loosen your happiness, if you will, in a knot of threads.

Lightly you may ask yourself, “What is this child (being ‘girlish’), in adult's lives, when there is so much loss of perspective?”  For certain it is a dream of leaving.  To take along stories no mere adult can express is that dream, with more than minor interruptions, more than those merely interstitial digressions.

It is a question of coming upon these poems, and these words, the resiliency of them.  So when construction, device pace this palette, then proper it is, and let us see why:

Judas Priest, father mumbles, who knows

the corrosive effect of small errors. The glider soothes

the young girl. The air smells deep green.

Her mind waits far in right field, dulled by that

 

wait. Haven’t you come to tell her

she’s having a happy childhood? A bat cracks.

A thwarted bug thuds against the screen.

It’s so quiet, no one hears you leave.

 

The leaving is surreptitious, a peeling away from well-tolled scene, from setting for confessional, as if in a moving, living alimony to be drawn from.  Memory pauses, feeds to action, becomes the child, but sorely, forwardly, by instructing quirky pulpy mountain of decision.

That was then, in miniature to be visited.  Today as well, in open-hearted partings, childhood awaits as if a glowing grasping of innocent objects, as if purely doll-wish, as if time-partnered in tinky traffic.  Of knotty breezes it awaits and stirs, but no less comically, no less serenely agnostical.  If it does, if it latches and clicks that way, it may well try a “Rite (for quitting the premises)” and so revel solemnly alone in simple coupling construction, so wickedly, so prancingly revanching and rebounding, and yet alone, and yet not “too old to learn,” and yet still alone, and yet permission-giving:

For one who owns the bewilderment

of departure

 

no circumstances are ordinary.

Scarve the neck, protect the ears.

 

On the way to displacing your

self-bundle of electricity

 

tender letters, tip the porter.

Underappreciated, your essential character

 

accompanies you. Through each turn-

stile, a quelling, a refuge awaits.

 

In tumult of transit

something inadvertently’s bound

 

to be lost or left.

First near, then far.

 

Symptoms of disconnect

may be treated with longing—

 

beyond reconciliation

for its own sake.

 

The sweet distress of longing

never was truant.

 

Earnest announcements are

entering you. Allow them to.

 

As tinkered, or as pre-thought, previous, it is a question of loneliness.  And yes as purely of childhood, and dolls, and playing with its pretention in an open, unemptied space, proceeding deliciously in that space for the fullness thereof, and for other plottings.  It is a gifted loneliness, extravagant, silly, scrumptious, and not equally about to slight the gifting mirror.

Childhood and childhood and childhood, ever a gifted day.  This pursuit may unload discrepancies of physical fear and factors.  What resides, what retreats into these physical factors, becomes the sling-shot miscast, leaves only the rough-shod, the almost unwanted material:

Broken Dolls Day

 

(June 3, Japan)

 

The stitched would never

heal. Nor could the smallest finger

 

missing of a hand be glued to a pudgy

plastic palm. She lies on her back—bye-bye

 

It is over. Around her those of the lost

screws, stuck eyes, detached

 

wires, burnt hair, punctured torso;

brother work, dog work, left out

 

in the rain. Played out. Over the wood,

wax, plastic, porcelain, papier mâché,

 

straw, leather, resin & cloth,

the four-foot hunchbacked monk

 

bows his ancient bald head.

O broken ones, we are

 

the careless world—forgive us

for we wore you as ourselves.

 

As far as dolls are concerned, in terms of self-fashioning related to childhood if it is truly to come through, it takes form, it takes the forming and the fashioning, to arrive to comparison, to breach to completion.  To this end an age-old form, the concrete poem, supplies rich detail, and all that is wanted.  Fully and broadly slanting wing on page top to bottom tenders “Doll Winging (the cicada died a natural death)” as both gorgeous and didactic.  The play of it colors the stretch of it, and they happen to be true, and trick and break out to delight.

And thus, and always, the importance lies in the charm, in having a thing for toys, trinkets and trimmings, and in plumbings freely pulsated off and engrossed in pattering the freedom from stellar harm:

My pert ponytail

like a girlish puppeteer’s

one of my good (sane) years

 

springing to life in the middle

of the episode

moving the mouth by the hand

 

And you may read along in miniatures not too different or too precious.  And not to worry, somehow all is arranged, goodly.  Somehow even this tasking of forms, so magnificent, of a poem like “Rite of Ten” or of the rondeau — truly blithely sexual tacked onto the overall incendiary fission — that is the title poem, sings summer-all, greeting and graceful.

And for blessings of construction and of happiness, yes go read this book.  You may find what more there is to stay.

fin

Steve CannonTribes